Home
Gallery
Inspiration
Contact
Medium
Equipment
|
|
Hockney isn't generally thought of as a
photographer, but I think that what he has done in photography is more
significant than his painting and drawing.
Essentially the eye does not work like a
camera. When we look at the world we scan a scene, building up our view from
those elements to which we give our attention. As we move through a scene we
see objects from many points of view, and attend more to those that are
important to us generally as human beings, as well as to those that interest us
personally.
In fact when we study human consciousness it
is even more complex than that. Our minds or brains do so much preliminary
processing that they do not even necessarily present information to
consciousness in the same sequence as it is gathered!
Hockney believes that many, perhaps most, or
even all orthodox photographs are lifeless, and that ultimately they are less
real than good paintings and drawings because:
- A photograph fixes a single instant, so there
is no sense of movement through time. An entire dimension of experience is
lost.
- A photograph fixes a view from a single
perspective (the one-eyed man looking through a hole). We have become
accustomed to think of this as being "realistic", but in fact the
camera simply mechanises one particular way of representing the world, which
was developed in the Renaissance. Other approaches are possible, and in many
ways superior, such as the Cubist approach of representing many aspects of a
subject simultaneously.
Hockney points out that it is much more
difficult to fake or alter a cubist image by modifying it after the fact than
it is to modify a conventional photograph - whether for aesthetic, commercial,
or political ends.
He has developed ways of producing
multi-faceted photo-collages (which he calls "joiners") from hundreds
of smaller photographic images, and has applied them to interiors, landscapes,
portraits, groups of people, and still-lifes. Basically he has invented
"Cubist photography".
I think Hockney is a bit unfair on the
conventional photographer - one of the challenges of photography is to so
arrange the elements of a scene that the eye is naturally led to explore it,
creating a sense of movement - but his new approach opens huge new
possibilities for photography, as well as creating some beautiful
images.
Here is one of his "joiners":
The Desk, July 1st 1984.
|